The End of Time
Do you have enough time to talk about time?

This theme of running out of time dominates our modern time, wouldn’t you agree? How are we to understand it? How can we run out of time? Yet this is what we say: “I don’t have time; I need more time; time is running out; there’s a dead line; we all don’t have much time left; there’s not enough time to save ourselves; it will all end in 2012” (or some other end date). A movie came out recently (In Time, 2011) that even exploits this theme:
By the year 2169, genetic alteration has allowed humanity to stop aging at 25. "Living time," which can be transferred among individuals on body contact, is displayed on a clock implanted in people's forearms. When this clock reaches zero, one dies instantly. We all use temporal language quite easily and quite unthinkingly. Words like when, before, afterwards, until, never, hope, intend, anticipate, dread, regret, remorse, nostalgic, are just some of the words we use to designate our immersion in time. English has an amazing subtlety in its verb forms to distinguish actions in time. “I was at the party” and “I had been at the party” suggest quite different time meanings: I was at the party and now I am at home (i.e. action in the present) vs. I was at the party before I went home (i.e. action still in the past). We can even talk about hypothetical past or future actions in time: “I would go to the party if somebody could drive me there”. Amazing subtlety! How about this complex thought about time: “I will have gone shopping by next Saturday!” The speaker is imaginatively locating herself in the future (next Saturday) and then talks about an action that temporally precedes that point of time in the future. Impressive!
So we can speak in temporal terms quite easily but when it comes to talking about time, trying to reflect on time itself, things get difficult. Let’s start with our modern sense of time, our common experience of time. We could call it Clock time or Mechanical time, for historical reasons. This time, as we all know, runs on independently of what you and I may say, think, or feel. Whatever mental states we are in we know that time goes on, at its own pace. This time is apparently independent of our psychology. We also talk of subjectively experienced time such as when reading a good book, time seems to pass quickly. But we are not fooled. We know that real Time, that is, Clock time, has passed at the same rate and that we were simply psychologically immersed in whatever activity we are doing, like reading. From this example we can draw a distinction. There appears to be quantitative time and qualitative time. Quantitative time is our Clock time, the time that governs our modern lives. This objective time is quantified by numbers—that’s it! Military Time is the most extreme form of this quantification: 0300 does not even include day or night (like 3AM does) which could be said to have qualities. Qualitative time is what we also call subjective time—our private experience of time passing slowly, being squeezed by time, losing time, etc. There is a clear difference in our current attitude towards these forms of time: Quantitative time is the real time, the objective time and qualitative time is merely subjective, a feeling we have that passes. When it comes to determining our real conduct in the world, we naturally turn to real time, i.e. Clock time, the objective, quantitative time.
Was it always this way?
There is a very interesting book, a work of fiction that is based on some good research into our past. The book is Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose. As well as being a gripping detective novel, it is also a study of monastic life in the 14th century. It portrays the historical moment when we were just beginning to distinguish quantitative measurement from qualitative description, on the way to developing the scientific mind. So, for example, a murder investigation looking for clues etc. was thoroughly confused with biblical Revelation and all the terrors of the end of the world. Eco developed his book from the structure of time that was operating in the 14th century i.e. the real time that governed the real lives of the monks and everybody else around them in the community. Here is how it worked:
The working day of the monks was structured by different times. They were: Prime, Terce, Sext, Nones, Vespers, and Compline. The important thing to note for our discussion is that each time was a qualitative time and the qualities of each time belonged to that time, not to the subjective experience of each monk. There was no Clock time! Each time was marked by a bell. Terce for example was that time shortly before daybreak when the monks went to choir, to recite hymns, psalms, verses, and the “Kyrie”. How different was the time of Terce from that of Compline in which the monks were asked simply to examine their conscience and seek acts of repentance (private prayer etc.), and during which the whole community, including guests, observes silence throughout the night until the morning service the next day!
From this example we can see some rather startling facts. We regard qualitative time as merely subjective, i.e. a purely psychological matter, within each of us. The 14th century monks, on the other hand, regarded qualitative time also as subjective but the subject having those qualities were the times themselves, not the monks. These times as we see even had names, like persons. They were intelligences, i.e., subjects! The monks lived in these different qualitative times throughout the day, themselves being objects determined by these subjects or intelligences. Each time came into being with a bell, rose into ascendancy, taking the monks with it, and expired, like a rose coming into bloom and then dying naturally. Each of these times was a living present that permeated and determined the monks’ existence, their thoughts, feelings, and actions for as long as it lasted, the bell signaling its death. The monks would then move on to another time, another present with its own unique qualities.
Are there any signs today that we are under the sway of a time that bears its own qualities, perhaps even deserving of its own name, like Nones, or Vespers—a time that determines our thoughts, feelings and actions, like the monks of the 14th century, and like Clock time today does with us? If there is, this time would have to compete with Clock time in terms of its reality and determination of our modern existence. I think there is such a qualitative time today. It can be sensed through our worldwide complaint of “running out of time” or “not having enough time.” I do not think it is accurate to say that this sense of time is subjective, i.e. within each of us psychologically. We just don’t experience it that way. It is a worldwide complaint about time i.e. objective time. Although clocks are still running at the same rate (Clock time), we no longer seem to be determined by this kind of time. Rather we are getting increasingly determined in our thoughts, feelings, and actions, by the growing conviction that we are objectively running out of time. When we experience our subjective sense of time, say as in reading a book and find that time seems to pass quickly, we can always put the book down and return to real time, i.e., Clock time. This is not so with our growing experience of running out of time. We can’t get out of it back into Clock time. Quite the contrary, this “running out of time” time is increasing its hold over us, producing anxiety, stress, alarm calls about the end of time, and so on. We could even call stress not a psychological or physical problem but a time disease! Time is objectively running out!
What could this mean?
As I said the worldwide tendency is to regard this fact as a literal one speaking to the end of Clock time, i.e., the end of the world. We have seen so many end dates now that I have lost count and yet when the end date passes, we simply insert the next one. So, today we have Dec. 12, 2012. What will come after that? The problem with this way of thinking about “running out of time” is that we are still tied to Clock time as the only objectively real time and thus the end of time can only mean that the clock stops—boom! We need another way to think about this world wide phenomenon of "running out of time". I suspect we are being initiated back into qualitative time again as an objective qualitative fact. Since the Scientific Revolution we have come to understand that quantity belongs on the outside and is objective, while quality belongs on the inside (within the perceiver) and is thus “merely” subjective.
I think this pair of opposites (objective-subjective) is undergoing a revolution, catching us up in the process. We have to learn to think about time in a new way. I believe we have to think about time as qualitative, as the 14th century monks did, but also, in some sense, as objective, like Clock time. Quality is being returned to the world as an objective fact. Up to the present time, qualities have been thought as belonging to us, within us. This has led to a world that has been denuded of quality altogether, simply now a world that can be quantitatively measured, and exploited. I strongly suspect that our worldwide experience of “running out of time” is forcing us to comprehend time as a quality, an intelligence, that is objective, “in the world” in some sense. I think this revolution in time is a hint of what is to come. Other qualities, not only time qualities, formerly held to be only within us human beings, are showing up “in the world”, as expressed in language, new language that we may not be quite aware of at this point. I think we are experiencing a revolution indeed, one in which the world, for so long denuded of qualities that impart richness, depth and texture to our existence is regaining its objective-subjectivity, its living intelligence, and taking us with
it in the process.
Can we listen to these hints in the right way?

John Woodcock
Back to Temenos
Temenos
-
Eternal Popups
Just when I'm at my lowest -
Total eclipse
Cirrus clouds and red moon -
Intentions Indeed
The Good Life: Inside and Out -
To play or not to play
The pursuit of happiness: does it make us happy? -
An Existential View on Dreams
We all are dreamers -
Waking up to Reality
Should we take our dreams more seriously? -
Flying Dreams
And the Evolution of Human Consciousness -
Getting to the Nitty Gritty
Girlfriends and the meaning of life -
Friendship
A Community of mind and Deep affection -
Friends More or Less
How many friends does one person need? -
An Ode to Friendship
Celebrating the Give and Take of Human Relatedness -
Time for Intimacy
A life in the fast lane is a lonely life -
As a Tribute to my Japanese heritage
I have written a kind of Haiku on Time -
Finding Balance
In a Culture obsessed with Competition -
Sometimes and Other Times
The Timelessness of Now -
Seen and Heard
Memories and mysteries and not many clues -
The End of Time
Do you have enough time to talk about time? -
Time in Therapy
Different strokes for different folks -
Body Clock
The Art of Listening to our deeper selves -
Time and Tyranny
Ticking clocks? May as well be ticking bombs -
Moment
By Dion Callanan -
Time Traveller
On my way to the present moment -
Procrastination
Yikes! Where has the afternoon gone? -
Keep me in the loop
The risks we take for social connection -
Time for Food
The importance of being mindful of what we eat
- Temenos Journal (26)
- Time (15)
- Friendship (4)
- Dreams (3)
- Authenticity and Play (1)
- Progress and Process (1)
- Bliss and Awareness (1)
- Poetry (3)
- Conversations (2)
- Reviews (10)
- Books (3)
- Films (8)
- Music (1)
- Library (64)
- Anxiety and Depression (5)
- Burnout and Balance (4)
- Career and Calling (2)
- Communication (1)
- Culture and Society (7)
- Education and Ethics (2)
- Emotions (5)
- Family and Parenting (15)
- Grief and Loss (3)
- Human Condition (9)
- Personality and Identity (3)
- Health and Wellbeing (1)
- Relationships (13)
- Trauma (4)
- Therapy (21)
- Professional Training (3)
- Conferences (1)
- Good Therapy News (2)
- Philosophical Enquiry (14)
- Forum Questions (174)
- July 2022 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (1)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (17)
- April 2013 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- November 2011 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (1)
- February 2009 (4)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- March 2007 (1)
- December 2006 (2)
- September 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (3)
- May 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (3)
- February 2006 (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (10)
- July 2005 (3)
- May 2005 (3)
- April 2005 (1)
- March 2005 (4)
- February 2005 (1)
- January 2005 (3)
- December 2004 (2)
- November 2004 (6)
- September 2004 (1)
- July 2004 (2)